Tuesday, October 31, 2023

I Wish I Could Say I Was Surprised

Some mornings I tune into a morning prayer service on YouTube. There have been times when the scripture readings and message have been meaningful. 

When I tuned in today, October 31, the clergy person welcomed everyone to All Hallows Eve. 

Here's a little background on this hallow or "holy" observance in the Church calendar: For centuries, the Church - particularly the Roman church and its 'derivatives', have observed All Hallow’s Eve as an evening vigil to watch and wait for the two holy days (which became All Saints' and All Souls' Days) that honor the friends, family, and heroic saints who are now part of the “cloud of witnesses” spoken of in Hebrews 12:1, and who the Church says is cheering us on from heaven as we run the race set before us. All Hallows’ Eve is said to be similar to Christmas Eve in that we [all] are eagerly and festively anticipating the holy day that follows. So, to recap: October 31 is All Hallows’ Eve, November 1 is All Saints’ Day, and November 2 is All Souls’ Day.  

This observance is not based on any command of Jesus or what the Holy Spirit instructs us in scripture  to follow (actually warnings against these observations are what you will find!). The beginnings are from long-held pagan observances celebrated by certain cultures around the world as the Day of the Dead. October 31 through November 1 was the date of a Celtic festival called Samhain, which marked the end of the harvest season. The Gaels believed that beginning at sun down on October 31, the boundary between the dead and alive thinned, and the dead would return home seeking hospitality among the living. If the dead  were not appeased, they would wreak havoc on livestock and crops, causing sickness and famine. So on October 31, the Gaels would don costumes, light bonfires, and imitate sorcery practices in order to ward off evil spirits and appease the dead, or suffer terrors from demons. In certain Latino and Caribbean cultures (some being influenced by African traditions), this observance appeases the dead by offering foodstuffs and gifts and wearing costumes representing the dead. Other cultures practice ancestor worship - revering the spirits of dead family and friends as homage to them, and appeasing them by offering certain sweets, other foodstuffs, etc. So, as was the Roman church's practice, it subsumed the pagan ritual in compromise to those pagan, idol worshiping people it was attempting to make obedient to the Roman church. In 835 the church supplanted this pagan festival, setting All Saints Day on November 1, the same day as Samhain. They replaced the havoc and mischief created by the evil dead on Samhain with a hopeful watching, waiting, and celebration of the holy dead, God’s saints. In the 11th century the Abbot (leader) of a Roman church monastery instituted All Souls' Day as the companion to follow All Saints' Day (previously it had no single fixed date on the church's calendar). Similarly with the contemporary context, a number of mainline church systems wrap this dead and devil worship in white clothes to camouflage the original pagan ritual observance. 1/

   ....So back to 2023: after a welcome / opening prayer, the clergy person proceeded to read 1 Samuel 28. For those not familiar with this passage, it concerns a king of Israel, Saul, who, bereft of God's presence and support because of his rebellion against God, desperately seeks to reach out to a now dead prophet and priest of Yahweh, Samuel, who had spoken God's words of rejection to Saul some time back. Now Saul wants God to fix what was going on in Israel as a result of his own rebellion. So, not hearing from God in his prayers, Saul seeks counsel from a seer, a witch at Endor, to reach out to Samuel's spirit. It gets even worse for Saul...

As the clergy person began the reading, I immediately saw the direction this message was going in:  about a witch on All Hallows Eve. After the reading of chapter 28, the clergy person described a personal experience growing up in the southwest where there was a heavy Mexican cultural influence. One of the cultural traditions is the celebration of the Day of the Dead (Dia de los Muertos), which is considered as a holy observance where, as noted above, there is a celebration of those dead who would make the annual visit to loved ones. Some of the celebrations have individuals dressing up as persons risen from the grave (the themes of what is Halloween). Those family and friends who are alive set up an altar called an ofrenda that is adorned with skeletal representations of some sort, candles, pictures of the loved ones, and may have food or drinks placed before it. Some claim to even speak to the dead spirits of the loved ones as the evening transitions to All Saints Day. 

And then, the clergy person held up a picture of their own ofrenda that was adorned with representations of skeletons, candles and mementos of loved ones who have passed. The clergy person beckoned those listening to deeply remember and honor on All Hallows Eve those family and friends who have passed away according to their own tradition. And as the clergy person was about to lead the listeners in The Lord's Prayer, I instantly switched off the video. My spirit felt like it was an act of blasphemy (yes, that's a strong term but that is what it felt like to me at that point). Do I go too far on this? Am I taking all of this out of proportion? 

And just a couple of days prior, a high-ranking and infamous LGBTQ clergy person was guest preacher at a world-renowned house of worship. 

I wish I could say I was surprised at any of this. I've seen it before in other iterations. But today it struck me even more soberly: to me it was like back-to-back Revelation 2:12-29. It made me and makes me very sad. I do mourn for the universal Church (I mean the entire Body of Christ) and the taints of apostasy it is experiencing, much like Jeremiah and the prophets mourned for Israel and Judah (and even Christ's sadness over those covenant people) because of its turning away from Yahweh and following after idols or created god substitutes. Even after the holocaust of Assyria's and Babylon's genocide, capture, and scattering of the people, after the 70 years of exile were over and they were returned back to the land -- once a land of promise, but which was now under the authority of the then current empire and succeeding empires (and the trauma they leave in their wake), the chosen people still returned to their rebellious ways. The chastisement and change of location was never to be the cure; what was needed and is always needed is a change of heart, which can only happen by God's hand. That is what we need in the Church today - Christians whose hearts were and are being changed, being sanctified to become like Christ, Christians whose lives are living sacrifices to God and not to the world and the devil. 

Church, here is the matter for us to ponder: Worship and celebration of the devil and this world one night, then a couple of months later hailing and celebrating the magic of Christmas. That is, observing and celebrating Christmas as a time of magic. Have we become so engrossed in the refashioning of God's miraculous sending of His own Son to earth to become Redeemer of mankind to open a way back to God into a season of mystical and magical granting of all whims and fancies and fulfillment of wishes? A recasting of what God has done into a beckoning of a holiday 'spirit' that promises material blessings of some kind or another, while subordinating the sacrifice of God, shunting it to a tertiary place, or not even observing the significance of what God did at all? Is this honoring Christ? Is it really a mass or holy observation of what Christ did? Is it honoring God the Father? Is it honoring God the Holy Spirit? Or does it totter on the brink of blasphemy? 

Please, please make it make sense! 

1/ -Excerpted from a page on the Little Way Chapel Church website. Other online sources include the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Catholic Encylopedia, university pages, etc.

 

Tuesday, September 12, 2023

Sometimes... A Prayer Narrative

Following the pandemic shutdown, the number of people returning to the church building in person for worship has dropped significantly. At least in mine and other mainline faith communities I know about. People have become complacent, dare I say lazy, and prefer to have Zoom turned on, cameras turned off, so that they can stay in their bed clothes to 'attend' worship service. This is not secret information nor privileged secrets - folks have talked about these gaps over social media pages for a while. Persons who must have forgotten about how God wants to be worshiped - compare Exodus 19:9-11,17 and Nehemiah 8:1-8; Romans 12:1-2; 1 Corinthians 11:17-22; Ephesians 5:18-20; Hebrews 10:25. We praise God that He had made available the telecommunications that allowed us to worship remotely when everything was shutdown and person-to-person contact was dangerous. We did not have to 'skip a beat' in our worship. However, that was not to be a permanent situation; that situation has been suspended. 

And here we are. Kind of like the African Americans in remote places of the south who did not know that the Civil War had ended and slavery abolished - they believed that the status quo was to be the status quo forever. That slavery would never end. Some believed they were still slaves even throughout the remainder of the 19th century. That's the locked mindset of some professing Christians. 'I'm used to being a remote 'worshiper' having only myself to deal with. Getting washed up, dressed and traveling to a building is not necessary in order to worship.' Worshiping in person has become more of 'I'll worship when I get there - if I choose to come. Who knows? Zoom is so easy - all I have to do is click some keys and 'I'm in'. 

Not only has in-person worship become distasteful, Bible study has become less of a priority so that it is no longer on the menu for too many persons who profess to follow Christ. There is no longer the appetite for it to the extent it once was. I'm not talking the kind of Bible study that is lecture-driven and that are one-way orally so all you do is sit back and maybe look up a scripture during the talk or view it on the mag screen. Or online studies where you are the only participant - where there is no 'iron sharpening iron'. Nor am I talking about personal study and Bible reading time which are essential daily disciplines. These are commendable for the purpose they serve, but is not the same as small group Bible study. I'm talking about members of a faith community coming together with Bibles open and discussing together what the Spirit wants us to learn during that session. Some churches are able to do a hybrid type of group Bible study so that some meet in person and also accommodate via Zoom members who cannot drive, who may be using their work break to participate, are at home with their young ones and might be able to listen and engage in discussion a little at a time, etc. Other churches may do Bible study solely on Zoom where vibrant discussions take place.  Many church leaders have sought ways to engage their members in this vital spiritual discipline through as many practical means that are available, and yet, participation has either decline or has become almost nonexistent. I may be out of line, but I have to ask myself, how can we legitimately refer to ourselves as followers of Christ, if we do not study the scriptures together? How will we come to a knowledge of the truth? When a person of 50 has attended church services for all of his or her life, and is unable to grasp who the "Let us" of "Let us create mankind in our image" is - which is fundamental/foundational truth, how has such a person been using their Bible? Is it truly an open book, a place to seek God and determine His will, or is it on the shelf? What has happened to the desire to see the treasure God has given us in His Word, to taste and see the goodness of God throughout His Word? Do we even consider it to be God's Word, to even consider that it is meaningful for all who consider themselves human, created in God's image? Christ values every utterance from the mouth of the Father, so much so that He is called The Word! That He is the wisdom that we are to seek in scripture. He shared scripture amongst His disciples in an interactive way all during his ministry. Sometimes, it seems that we have recreated worship to please ourselves so that it is just enough 'Christian' in it to get by. What god does a person with that mindset serve? When will a person who belittles the gift of God's Word realize that with such distaste, how can you be saved? What would you even be saved for if worshiping God in the way He wants to be worshiped has no appeal for you?

'Thus saith the Lord:'  (Hebrews 2:1-4)   1)Therefore we must pay greater attention to what we have heard, so that we do not drift away. 2)For if the message declared through angels proved valid, and every transgression or disobedience received a just penalty, 3)how will we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? It was declared at first through the Lord, and it was confirmed for us by those who heard him, 4)while God added his testimony by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit, distributed according to his will. 

Sometimes, only a very small percentage of a congregation may gather for Bible study. Where are those who bend the knee to commune at the Lord's Table, for it is the same Word who commanded the observance of this New Covenant? I ask God will it always be this way? Am I doing enough to engage others? Please tell me what more I should be doing! [I want to say to those who give the excuse - "well, I don't want to seem ignorant because I don't know all the answers and embarrass myself! So maybe later." -- I want to ask them, "Be sure to rehearse that excuse convincingly well, because Judge Jesus is coming soon and He will be asking."] 

But a recent small group study completed, and after the closing prayer, the picture that came to my mind was Abraham speaking to God, who was angry with the people of Sodom and Gomorrah: "How great is the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah and how very grave their sin!" and who was poised to destroy completely every human in those places. Read the account in Genesis 18:22-33 in your own Bible. Abraham began to plead with God because his nephew Lot and his family lived in that wicked place. Lot would go to the gate - which in those times was like the convening place for conferring with the leaders of the city or town and where they held their town meetings. In that way, he figured he had bought time or some kind of favor to be relieved of any unwanted assault or attention, for the people were aggressive with their sexual immorality and lusted with heat - seeing any and everyone as someone to be joined with regardless of gender or species. Lot thought that he had made peace enough with the people so that they would not prevail against his family. The money and illusion of power and importance Lot enjoyed took precedent over hating the very thing that God hated, and instead, deluding himself into justifying his continued presence in that wicked and evil city was not an issue for him.

And Abraham, some distance away, knowing that God was going to wipe out completely both cities, kept asking God these 'what if' questions: what if like 50 people might be righteous in the city, will you still destroy everyone--what if forty-five are in the city, will you still destroy everyone--what if, what if, what if, and Abraham, sensing that he's walking a thin line here, stops at what if ten - hoping that would cover Lot's situation. I was thinking, what if, Lord, our study group was only 30 people, would you still show us your favor and blessing? What if there were only twenty-five of us, would you still show us your favor and blessing? What if, what if, what if, what if, what if there are only 4 of us studying your Word together regularly, would you still show our congregation favor and blessing?  

Lord, not only am I praying for the 100, or the 30, or the 4, but Lord I am asking you to please send more laborers into this harvest, persons who believe Bible study is a vehicle to open our minds, hearts to the revelation of You, to knowing You, to growing closer to You, to living in this wicked world and yet not being of the world, that it is within your Word the stuff to teach us to pray and to shape and inform our prayers so that they will be in alignment with your will, to understand your will for each of us? I should be praying, What if our congregation could be a congregation that studied your Word zealously and applied it? What would our congregation look like?  What if we choose not to neglect so great a salvation, so great because your only Son was hanged on a cross to make a way for us to know you, to commune with you, to worship you and serve you and each other? What would our congregation look like then? What if we obeyed Christ's commandments - for which we must open His Word to find - with our whole hearts, minds and souls - what would our church community look like? What could we accomplish in our surrounding neighborhoods? What gifts could we employ that You have or would graciously be giving us to use to your glory and to serve others which will bring people to Christ? 

Sometimes, I wonder what if and pray, like now, to see such faith in action before I leave this earth, to see more congregations become on fire for Christ and what He would have us do. That we would be the community of love, that we would enjoy learning more and more about our Lord so that we can effectively lead our households to become lovers of righteousness? Lord, what if we prayed your Word together regularly? What if what we do daily will cause you to say, 'Well done, good and faithful servant'? 

Why would you let us build a house for you if we are not worshiping you now in the way you would have us do? If we fail, would You not be justified to take that house from us and give it to those who have a zeal for you and who sacrificially serve you daily? 

Father, I beseech your mercy, I offer up confession that we have forsaken what identified us as your children. Like the prodigal, we left well dressed, full of life, eager to be independent. We are now in tatters, unsure of where we are in your plan, unsure of our ability to do anything, and with our faces pressed into the mire. If it is what it would take, please chastise us, also, so that we can be shocked back into spiritual sanity and return to you without question, without hesitation. Lord, for the sake of your name and in the power of the Holy Spirit may He saturate us in awareness of what we must do now, rather than choosing to wait "for just the right time, sometime." Today is the day of salvation, now is the time to return. Praying for that miracle, Lord, praying and trusting that our sometime has come to fullness and our what ifs into faith in action. In Jesus Name. Amen.


Tuesday, September 5, 2023

The House of the LORD

The following are thoughts inspired by an act of God today, and represent my personal understanding of scripture.

One of our favorite Psalms, Psalm 23, is one in which David understood the blessing of relationship with God -  that it was not a thing solely about being happy and having material rewards. He believed with all his heart that being in relationship with the God of Creation, with Yahweh Elohim was the true and utmost blessing of his life. (Psalm 18:1-3; Psalm 136, 139)

David also understood - as we must today - that the House of the LORD was an expression and gift of God to His people as a place of worship and praise to God, a beneficial, encouraging exhortation of how to show God's love to one another. It was a place of learning, and the center of schooling corporately in the way of God and the importance of learning to trust God. It was a place where they would spiritually meet with God uniquely and see His glory.

David's love for God's House was not a matter of a particular room or space per se - he saw the entire house as God's dwelling! (Psalm 26:8; 93:5; 134:1-2; 135:1-3)

My recent experiences in the role of caring for God's House has been enlightening. Just a few minutes ago, God opened my mind to the broader understanding of what it means to be in the House of the LORD, to be a caretaker - a steward - of His House. I dropped everything else I was doing (my stomach is demanding food, but that can wait!), and hurried to write these things down before the concerns of the day overwhelmed.

There are 'perspectives' within our house of worship held by a number of persons as to what is "important" in God's House. One group honors as 'sacred only' their meeting space, where they pray and praise, to the extent that anything that is not considered holy or used in worship must be considered profane and removed from the space and put into another part of the building that the group considers less than holy, but where others need to meet to commune with God and to worship HimThere are some who consider the single, most holy part of the building is the place where the altar sits under or next to the cross, with the second place being the sacristy (a room that holds sacred implements of worship). Everything else is, for them, regarded as less holy or perhaps not even considered to be in the camp of holy. 

But God said that His House was holy - not just some of the square footage, but all of it! (compare Psalm 122; Deuteronomy 23:18; 1 Kings 8:6-11; 1 Chronicles 26:27; Psalm 26:8; Psalm 116:18-19) David knew that truth. David also knew that it was God's House - not ours; God owns it and God provided it. For whatever reason, we have allowed our personal biased viewpoints to lead us into actions, attitudes, activities - or lack thereof, that dishonor God's House, and we may not even be aware we are doing it. Yes, the sanctuary altar is where we offer sacrifices to God, praise Him, bless Him, seek His face during solemn worship. In ancient Israel's Tabernacle and later the Temple in the Most Holy room, God's presence would be evidenced by a cloud of smoke above and/or within those holiest rooms. The Most Holy is referred to as the Holiest of Holies, conveying that all of the House itself was a holy place, with spaces assigned for varying acts of worship and service. During the exile of the Jews by Babylon, profiteers (the main ones mentioned by Nehemiah are Sanballat, Tobiah, and Geshem [2:19]) came into Jerusalem and set up camp. When the priests and others were released from captivity and ensued upon the project to build a temple that would replace the one Solomon built, which had been destroyed completely, the completed project yielded the fleshing out of the plans that God had given Ezekiel (chapters 40-44) to give to those upon whom the assignment to rebuild rested. The profiteers tried to halt the work through "shenanigans" which failed; yet, would at an opportune time seize on the chance to use God's House for their selfish gains: taking rooms appointed for the priestly activities and turning them into boarding rooms for profit and gain, with the assistance of a dishonest priest. Misusing and desecrating selected spaces within the building defiled God's entire House. (Nehemiah 13:1-14)

Again, the entire building is God's House; He does not lay claim to only a portion of it - all of it is His. He is the one who deems it holy before Himself. He is the gifter/provider; we are to be the stewards of the whole House. No ifs, ands, or buts. To do otherwise, is either a passive or deliberate offense and defilement of God's House. (compare Nehemiah 13:11) Sure, we are not perfect and we may forget or get busy with other things, but if we, regardless of what church we may belong to, are being reminded frequently that we are needed to be hands and feet for Christ, and continue to shrug it off, it should make us take stock of where priorities lie. God may be calling us to steward even a small fragment of what needs to take place, but if we shut up our ears and dull ourselves to that call, we will never know the special blessing that comes with that request. (compare Matthew 25:14-30) So whether it is in a sanctuary or place of corporate prayer, in a classroom, in a storage space, in a remote part of the building used by stewards of the plate offerings, in the restrooms, in a meeting room, in an office space, in the hallways, the courtyard, the parking lot - it is ALL part of God's House. To neglect any part, to cheapen its intent, is an offense - intentional or otherwise. To 'trash' or disrespect any space by leaving the space neglected or unclean, or to leave it in a run-down condition is an offense. To willfully deface any part of the building is an offense. To dismiss the maintenance and stewardship of any of the spaces is an offense. An offense to God!

So, this awareness should give anyone whom God has blessed with a dedicated building for worship and fellowship in praise and thanksgiving cause to pause: whether the building is by lease or ownership, and regardless of what denomination, but one that claims Christ, and where God has provided His people with a building as a launching pad for greater witness and service within the surrounding community - how are we responding to this gift? Do we see it as a reminder of Whose we are and all of what He has made us stewards of? Does it expand in our hearts and minds deep gratitude, the comprehension of what it means to glorify God in His House and in our lives? 

Consider that the physical building is to reflect the building up of God's spiritual house stone by living stone, and vice versa. We who are called by God to serve and be adopted as children are individually living stones, but when placed one beside the other we become built into the Spiritual House of God. No stone is lesser than the other!! (1 Peter 2:4-10; Ephesians 1:3-14,17-23)

IT IS HIS HOUSE - ALL OF IT!  We cannot love one space and disregard or hold profane another.  We must ask ourselves: what does this mean to me, for me, and about me? Am I thinking like David and seeking to dwell in the House of the LORD, where His Name dwells, to worship, honor and praise Him for the gift of relationship and of a special building made available by Him no matter how old or new, that He has set aside for us to revere Him in? Or, am I thinking like Sanballat and crew and dismiss, even desecrate, the holiness of God represented in the building and misuse it, rejecting the stewardship of it?

Let this be our prayer: I love you LORD with my whole heart, my whole mind, my whole soul! Thank you for the gift of your House to us where we can come together in assembly and serve and worshp you, because you deserve all praise and honor and glory! No act of worship is too small to you, Almighty God and Father, no service in your House and among your people too little when it is from the heart. Father, your mercy and goodness in my life are like the grains of sand at the seashore -- who can count all the moments of grace and favor you bestow? In your House, we will raise holy hands; we shall use those hands of praise to be stewards of all that you have gifted us with - both physical and spiritual to your glory and by your grace. Lord, may I never fail to praise you; let me dwell in your house, the house of the Lord forever, may I never turn away from your presence. Amen.

Wednesday, August 30, 2023

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Reserve Question D - Love God with Whole Heart, Mind, Soul)

 

Reserve question D. What does Jesus mean when He says: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’”? This passage can be found in part or in whole in the Gospels at Matthew 22:37, Mark 12:30, and Luke 10:27. 

Actually, Jesus means just what He said. Compare to answers at B & E. Our love for God must be as a child’s love for a Loving Father. It must also mean that we love ourselves less, that is, we step down from our self-made thrones to never re-occupy them. An example: would you seek treatment for a serious disease from a doctor whose heart is no longer engaged with healing? Would a marriage be happy if one of the spouse's heart feelings are for someone else who is not the spouse, and who would reaffirm his or her divided heart daily? Jesus states at Matthew 6:24, that a divided heart is not acceptable to God, saying "You cannot serve God and mammon/wealth at the same time. You will love the one and hate the other." Thus, our whole self, our whole heart, our whole minds must be primarily focused on God; dividing our affections with God and satan's world will not work; you cannot have one foot in and one foot out. Part of the perspective of satan's world is making a job, a career, a hobby, a source of pleasure, a chiild or spouse, a famous person the most important thing in our life; to elevate that person or thing to an idol, giving it prime attention over things of God.

We are to grow continuously in love with the Lord; one of the best ways is meditating on His Word and communing with Him in prayer informed by scripture. Our actions towards others must reflect love of God. Jesus said we – the Church – would be known for the love we have for one another. That agape love and philia affection are to be the highlights of the Church. 

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Reserve Question C - Blessed Virgin Mary)

 

Reserve question C –The Blessed Virgin Mary: we know that, in order for God’s salvific plan to be accomplished, Jesus could not have been born through human reproduction; a virgin was chosen to carry His human life in her womb. The virgin, of course, was Mary; however, did she remain a virgin after Jesus’ birth? Even though she is venerated by a number of denominations, is it appropriate to pray to her or “through” her? (Luke 1:26-56)  Some denominations say yes, however, scripture tells us that Jesus had brothers and sisters. Read Matthew 12:46-50. One of Jesus’ brothers, James, is credited with writing the epistle James. The Roman Catholic tradition says about Mary's "Perpetual Virginity: Mary was a virgin before, during, and after the birth of Jesus. This is a blatant contradiction of scripture. They perceive her to be a "co-redemptrix" with Jesus, implying that Jesus was not enough to save, that Mary was obliged to coordinate and cooperate with Jesus in the role of salvation. Tradition also says that Mary had no other children - only Jesus. Yet, there are some in Roman Catholic leadership who are contesting that view, because they opened their Bibles and read it for themselves. Still, they are contesting minimally, or silently in some cases. 

As far as praying through her, see 1 Timothy 2:5-6. There is only ONE mediator between God and man, and it is not Mary. Even though she was blessed to be used for a divine purpose, she was not perfect and therefore could not fulfill the role of a mediator for sins or for a prayer stand-in. The Roman Catholic tradition teaches, however, that when the angel Gabriel asked her about bearing God's Son, that at the moment of her consent, she was made perfect, that the "stain" of sin was removed. And that her consent/assent to be used by God obliged her to remain a virgin all of her life. 

Then why was Joseph even in the picture??? 

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Reserve Question E - hate you mother and father so that you can become a part of the Christ's kingdom)

 

Reserve question E. In Luke 14:26 Jesus says that unless we hate family and self we can have no part in His kingdom. Whaaat? What does He mean? 

  • So, when you hear the word “hate”, what comes to mind? ……….
    In our culture today when we use the word hate, we are speaking usually of a strong negative emotion about or against something or someone, a very strong dislike or disregard, right?

  • For Jesus to actually mean hate -  as in despise, abhor, one's mother or father, would be a blatant contradiction of the Mosaic law to honor mother and father. Was Jesus a lawbreaker or promoting sin? 

  • So, for an understanding we have to examine the original language in which this was written or spoken. As we are seeing, in the Greek and Hebrew languages in which the Bible was written, there are times when a word carries more than one meaning. Is that true in anyone’s mother tongue or possibly a new language someone is learning?

  • The Greek word for hate, miseo. carries different meanings, with the word we commonly use as “hate” being only one of them. But that meaning is not in this context. The Greek word carries these meanings: miséō, mis-eh'-o; from a primary μῖσος mîsos (hatred); to detest (especially to persecute); by extension, to love less, to regard with less affection than. 

  • Therefore, when Jesus says that unless we hate family and self we can have no part in His kingdom, He is effectually saying, unless you love less or love Me more than family and self, then you can have no part in His kingdom.

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Reserve Question B - bear our cross)

 

Reserve B, Jesus said that we each would need to bear our cross daily (Luke 9:23; also 14:27). What it means and what it does not mean:

  • In the days that Jesus walked the earth, what did the people understand a cross to be? Jewelry, a logo? No–it is an instrument of torture and execution. 
  • In Jesus’ particular circumstance, what did the cross mean?  --For Jesus to be on the torture stake or cross signified the sacrificial death for which He came to earth to live as a human. It was only through such great sacrifice that Jesus could effect the restoration of relationship with our Creator. 
  • What does that mean to us in reference to the cross? Look at 1 Corinthians 6. Paul under the guidance of the Holy Spirit was writing to the Corinthian church a strong letter of admonition because of the practices in which they were engaged – practices that were immoral and unloving. He had to re-tell them, and explain to them what it actually meant to be a Christian. That it could only happen because Jesus died for them. But it wasn’t a death like the deaths they were accustomed to. Jesus’ death was one of sacrifice to redeem mankind from God’s wrath because of our sin estate. 
  • Also, because it was a redemption and not a ritual, i.e., something of value was exchanged for releasing or libertating someone, look at what Paul is led to write in verses 19-20.  We do not own ourselves, we have no absolute rights to ourselves. As those who are saved and are being sanctified, that life of submission to Christ is what we are to be living daily according to Luke 9:23 (also see Romans 12:1-2). 
  • What it does not mean, but what we have been taught to think it means: When Jesus instructed us to bear our cross, He wasn’t talking about people getting on your nerves or having problems, or even having chronic problems with this or that, chronic health issues.  No. Jesus expects those who are saved to be living their lives for Him – sacrificing ourselves, destroying our pride and so-called “rights” to independence. Eve coveted independence, to be her own "captain"; look where that got us. We are instead to live a righteous and holy life – which is opposite of what persons in the world do, which is the essence of the answer in Question E.
Therefore, let us not cheapen Jesus' instructions to us about bearing our cross; do not diminish the seriousness of Jesus' statement with a somewhere-along-the-line made up definition that our cross is some nagging problem or person. Is that why Jesus came to earth?

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Reserve Question A - When Two or Three Are Gathered) )

 

Reserve question A – when two or three are gathered there I am also. This phrase has been taken out of context so often by lay and clergy alike that it appears to literally mean just what it says. But does it??

  • Read John 17:20-21 first and then re-read, contextualizing with verses 13-23.  Therefore, if Jesus is saying that Christ is in us, then we are never separated from the Lord. He is always present. Ergo, we do not need to add a second or third person in order to experience the presence of Christ.  
  • Having laid that foundation, let's read Matthew 18:20. Now, as is very important to do when we come across a hard saying, we need to re-read with the context: verses 15-20. What is being referred to here? Per Mosaic law (Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15, which any Jewish believer would be familiar with, in a trial a minimum of 2 and even better 3 reliable and true witnesses must be brought forward to testify in regards to the matter; a single witness is not enough. Jesus continues that discussion by saying that in His kingdom – the invisible Church and Reign of the Triune God, He is the Lord and Supreme Judge, that we must likewise hold to the standard of 2 or 3 witnesses when we gather to resolve a matter or conflict; Jesus will be present in the role of Judge. We must be informed by the Spirit and the Word and prayer to receive Jesus’ guidance on the matter and proper resolution. 
Therefore, again, please pay attention to the context of a statement or phrase in scripture. For us to say that we have to wait to be joined by an additional 2 or 3 persons to pray, to offer worship, to teach someone, or even read the Bible, is a contradiction of scripture and of who we are in Christ. To tell a person that their worship is only legitimized when joined by 2 others is leading that person astray.

Special Mid-Summer 3-Night Series on Hard Sayings of the Bible (Answers to Questions 5a and 5b - "and on this rock")

 

1.    a.  Matthew 16:15-19.  Jesus held an interesting conversation with His disciples after going a ‘round’ with the Pharisees and Sadducees. He asks them: “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” They tossed out a couple of names, then Simon Peter says: “You are the Messiah, the Son of the Living God.” Then Jesus says to Simon Peter: “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you but my Father in heaven has. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Many readers of this passage believe that Jesus was anointing Peter to be head of the church, and the Roman Catholics also say that Peter was the first Pope. What message was Jesus giving His disciples at that time, and throughout the millennia?

b.
By the power of the Holy Spirit, Simon Peter writes to the elect in Christ the message in 1 Peter 2, beginning at verse 2 through 10 (this was part of a recent lesson preached on at a Sunday worship service). What is being conveyed in this passage about our identity as Christians – which Jesus was implying in His words recorded at Matthew 16:15-19?

 Answers:

 

a.    This is one of those hard passages that, when read at face value in the English language, appears to be saying that Jesus was anointing Peter to be head of the Church!  If that was true, then Jesus would be contradicting the Holy Spirit who said in other places, including verses in Ephesians 5, verses in John’s Gospel, chapter 3, at Colossians 1:15-20, 24, in Revelation, and implied elsewhere that Jesus is the head of the Church. Let’s turn to Colossians 1:15-20,24.  Jesus is the Head of the Church. So what is Jesus saying in Matthew 16, then?

It is helpful again to return to the original language of this passage (Koine Greek). Jesus blesses Peter as He refers to him as Simon Bariona/Simon son of Jonah. He adds, "Because flesh and blood did not reveal this" mystery to you but My Father in heaven did. So Peter, God spoke to you and gave you this revelation – what a blessing!! You are Petros/Peter, and on this petra/rock – this understanding that I, Jesus, Am the Messiah, the Son of Man, long foretold, as in centuries gone by, and it is on this Rock – this Foundation – will My Kingdom be built.  You will be given authority in this Kingdom (represented by the keys), Peter, as will those who will be anointed with you for that purpose, to, through the Holy Spirit,  bind and loosen, to be My Kingdom Ambassador here on earth. So in this promise, Jesus has given Peter a "2-fer," (1) awareness of the blessing just now bestowed upon him, and (2) the further revelation that in His, Christ’s kingdom Petros/Peter will be given certain authorities. For example, look who Christ appoints to reveal the kingdom and who identifies the Holy Spirit anointing at Pentecost! There would be further revelations given to Peter about his role in God’s kingdom; he would share responsibilities with other apostles.

This corresponds to Ephesians 2:20 – let’s read that. Jesus is the foretold chief cornerstone of the Church - the Rock. Does anyone know the purpose of a cornerstone or foundation stone?

                                          St. Albans, Washington DC

Now let’s turn to 1 Peter 2:2-10 to further capture the full meaning. Remember, this is Peter, the apostle that the Roman Catholic Church mislabels, wrongly identifies, as the Head of the Church, who is writing under the guidance of the Holy Spirit the explanation of Matthew 16:15-19.


According to what the Holy Spirit says here, how does Peter describe The Rock, Jesus Christ?  (vss. 4, 6-8) Why "living stone"?

Who are the other living stones? What happens to them? (v. 5) How is it built?


     What does it mean to be a royal priesthood? (v. 5,9) 


     How does that understanding affect how you look at your calling to be a disciple of Christ?

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Question 4 - Hell))

 

1.    Why does God send people to hell if He is a God of love? (note the emphasis)

For many years many Christians have been taught either directly or indirectly, that if we sin, God will send us to hell. What is hell? There are two definitions. 

  • First, it is the definition of grave or the state of the dead. The Apostles’ Creed says that Jesus descended into hell at His death -see page 53 in the Book of Common Prayer. In this instance, the words “Hades” and “Sheol” are interchangeable with the word “hell”. 
  • The second definition of hell is that it is eternal separation from God, an existence in complete darkness. The Bible uses the image of fire to represent complete destruction of any hope of life again in the “light”; in human experience the only persons who, by God’s Divine will, literally lived in a fire without a speck of smoke on them nor any singe of fire on them were Meshach, Shadrach, and Abednego, as recorded in Daniel chapter 3. Their being cast into the fiery furnace because they refused to worship the king. The king was so enraged (after all, he had conquered the entire nation and now here were 3 upstarts who thought that their wills were unconquerable), that he ordered the fire to be “cranked up” high to the highest heat level possible; the heat of the fire destroyed the very guards who cast them into the fire. Fire destroys completely; no one could reassemble ashes back to their original form. Thus, the Bible speaks of this definition of hell when it describes a permanent separation from God as the “lake of fire” or “eternal fire”. If you have ever been in a house fire where the heat escalates and the electricity fails, so that the black smoke all but eliminates a person’s ability to see their hand before their face, use that picture to understand what this permanent separation could look and feel like. Complete and eternal darkness.

So, the question: why does God send people to hell? The answer: God does not send people to hell.


The fact is, people are already condemned to go to hell because they are sinners, obeying the god of darkness (compare Ephesians 2:1-4). Because of that humanly irreversible sin condition and the rebellion attached to it, God’s wrath is naturally upon them – regardless of what they themselves, or anyone else says otherwise. But God, who in His great love and mercy for those created in His image, gave his only begotten Son as the means to escape the wrath. Let’s see that at Romans 5:6-11, and also the clearly spoken illustrative declaration by Jesus in Matthew 25:31-46. As Jesus indicates, the lake of fire what we call hell, was created for the devil and his angels from before time because of their rebellion to God. Since the fall of man in the garden, we have been obliged to follow the king of all rebellion into the same fate as he and his demons because of our inherited sin and accompanying lifestyle and allegiance to the devil’s world system. Let's say that you are on a cruise ship and something happens that is causing the ship to slowly sink. The ship releases its lifeboats; the Coast Guard rushes to the scene with additional lifeboats. What is the purpose of the lifeboat? To rescue someone from certain death. Between the two rescue options, there are more than enough lifeboats to save everyone on board the cruise ship. What would you do: get into a lifeboat, or take your chances with the sinking ship? After all, all of your possessions that you brought on board are still in the cruise ship and maybe there is still time to run and grab them! Do you pass up a seat in the lifeboat in the hopes that you will be able to retrieve the precious items and get on one of the lifeboats when you reach the deck? That's the same scenario that faces all of us: God has made a provision for deliverance from the sinking ship through the blood of His Son, Jesus Christ, and accepting Him as Lord and Savior. He is the Lifeboat. Will you choose to accept Him, or will you cling to those things that give you pleasure, wealth, feel-good vibes, etc. and try the Lifeboat later? Or maybe you have already chosen...

The Ten Plagues on Egypt - Why and on Whom

Almost every Sunday School curriculum - at one time or another - has covered the 10 plagues on Egypt, as it covered the narrative of God's rescue of His people from Egyptian bondage and slavery. Let's refresh our memories on what they were, and then we will attempt to answer the "why and whom": turn in your Bible to Exodus chapter 7, beginning at verse 1 for context and read of the plagues through chapter 12. As you read the account, try to immerse yourself into the story, either as an eyewitness or better yet, in the land of Goshen where the Israelites lived so that you would have experienced what they experienced.

As a serious Bible student will know, the deliverance from Egypt is only one part of the full story. And the full story is only one part of God's overarching plan of salvation (see John 3:16-21). So we start in the Garden of Eden, we witness the betrayal by Adam and Eve and the devil's deception as he poses/speaks through a snake (sidebar: satan the devil has now had several thousand years to "perfect" his evil intention of turning all of mankind against God - and he is really good at it). Being ousted from the perfect Garden, Adam and Eve are in the wilderness suffering from the sin condition that has come upon them physically, mentally, and spiritually. This condition settles into their "DNA", i.e., it is a permanent characteristic of humanity, so that it is passed on from generation to generation. Yet, it was not only impacting humans, but every living thing over which God had initially given them dominion (Genesis 1:26-28; compare Romans 8:19-22) 

In only a handful of generations following the fall in the Garden, the wickedness of human mindsets, morals, and a seeking after other gods had spread throughout the entire inhabited earth; God was grieved over what sin had accomplished in humans so quickly, and how the earth had fared under the 'supervision' of mankind and, justifiably, because of the ravage that sin had caused, God sought to remove that wickedness from the earth. (see Genesis 6:5-8) He would call a faithful man, Noah, to be a witness and to forth-tell as he built the ark of salvation according to God's specific criteria that God's wrath had declared a destruction of sin and those who rejected Him in due time. For 100 or so years, the opportunity was there; however, only Noah and his family - 8 human souls, along with the God-directed collection of land and winged animals would survive the punishment (Genesis 6:8-8:22).

In time, God calls Abram from Ur of the Chaldeans to serve Him. He was to go to Canaan and settle there to fulfill another step in God's salvific plan - the raising up of a people with whom He would come into covenant relationship with. God promised Abram, whose name would be changed by God to Abraham, that he would have offspring more numerous than the stars of heaven. The LORD promised the land of Canaan to Abraham as the place where his descendants would dwell (Genesis 12-17). God would, at the appointed time, open Sarah's womb so that she would bear a son, Isaac, who would be Abraham's promised heir. God also prophesied through Abraham what He would do at an appointed time - offer up His own Son (Genesis 22). Isaac would eventually marry, and would become father to Jacob who, through Divine intervention, would come to be known as Israel. Jacob would become the promised heir, would have 12 sons. One of his sons, Joseph, would be sold into slavery by his jealous brothers, and eventually come to be in Egypt. Through a series of Divinely-willed events, Joseph would become the vice regent of Pharaoh, with the authority of a ruler over Egypt. A famine was foretold that would overtake the region from Canaan to Egypt and surrounding areas. Jacob (Israel) would take his entire household - family, servants, slaves - and relocate in Egypt to join his son Joseph. Years later, Joseph would die; however, the Israelites would be fruitful and multiply in the land of Goshen in southern Egypt. Because Joseph had garnered through the grace of God favor of the Pharaohs, the Israelite people lived well and flourished for about 400 years. However, a new Pharaoh would arise who developed a hatred for the Israelite people, eventually enslaving them and relegating them to captivity in the land. 

And so we now come to the appointed time for God's deliverance of His people. God raised up for Himself an unlikely prophet named Moses, whose life God had preserved despite Pharaoh's mandate for all male Israelite infants to be killed. Moses would come to live in Pharaoah's household until he was 40 years old; Moses would kill an Egyptian who was beating an Israelite, news of which spread like wildfire. Moses escaped to the land of Midian, where he would remain in hiding for 40 years as a shepherd. God was ready to use Moses, even though Moses was reluctant to be the leader and God's agent to deliver His people. God would call Moses' brother, Aaron, to join him for this amazing calling. They were to go to Pharaoh and deliver the message from The LORD, the I AM: "Let My people go." God told Moses that He would harden Pharaoh's heart, i.e., would leave Pharaoh to his own arrogance and rejection of Israel's God, never to relent of his choice to go against the will of The LORD (Genesis 3:19; Exodus 4:21). 

The Israelites were at first very skeptical of Moses' authority and mission, and blamed him for the added labor punishment that Pharaoh had chastised them with. Even Moses became discouraged when Pharaoh immediately rejected God's demand and the people railed against him! God would respond to Moses complaint by using Moses to reveal more fully to the people who the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is, and what He was about to do. God would tell Moses that He was making Moses like God to Pharaoh, and that Aaron would be the prophet / spokesperson. God confirmed again that Pharaoh's heart would grow harder with each successive sign, until God forces His hand and causes Pharaoh to surrender. 

THE PLAGUES

God had ordained 10 plagues to befall Egypt, chiefly to glorify Himself before the human leader Pharaoh and confirm His Sovereignty, His claim to the people of Israel  The people of Egypt would suffer greatly because of the rejection by their god, Pharaoh, of the I AM's demand to release all of the Israelites. These plagues would be unlike anything Egypt had encountered before, impacting both man and beast and the very land itself - defying the Egyptian gods of land, water and creation -- Geb and Khnum, Aker, Amun, and leaving even the war god Anhur, weak and impotent. They would befall the people in succession - one after another, even though the intervals between each varied. They would come to fear the Almighty God of the Israelite people and eventually do all they could to placate their God and turn his wrath away.

What is as interesting to a Bible student is the fact that not only did the Egyptians need to witness the revelation of the God of Israel, but also God's people, the Israelites, needed to know who the I AM, the LORD was. They had not had a personal relationship with this God about whom they spoke about from generation to generation. They did not know him aside from being the "God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob," their forefathers. They did not know Moses aside from the couple of times they interacted with him; the older Israelites who were still alive would remember Moses as a prince of Egypt until he fell out of favor, which would have cut off any authority he may have had until that time. They have only heard the words that Moses told them were from the I AM; they did not have intimate knowledge of who this "God" was. They lived as a people in a land of multiple gods for every experience in life in the culture of Egypt. The descendants of Israel enslaved in Egypt needed to believe in a God who was great, who was powerful, and who would come to their rescue. They needed to know Him as Sovereign over all creation - not just a favored deity of their forefathers. God would show them who He was, and what His power and authority were: He would allow the Israelites a taste of that power and authority by permitting them to know and even be exposed to the first three plagues that God would pronounce against Egypt!

There is a point upon which not all Bible scholars agree, based on how they interpret Exodus 7:19-21, 8:2-6, 16-18 and the reference to the "whole country of Egypt." But, as we approach the account of the fourth plague - the flies, notice this new statement in verses 21-22, which is not found in the first three plague pronouncements: "21Otherwise, if you won’t let my people go, I will send swarms of insects [flies] on you, your servants and your people, and into your houses. The houses of the Egyptians will be full of swarms of insects, and likewise the ground they stand on. 22But I will set apart the land of Goshen, where my people live — no swarms of insects will be there — so that you can realize that I am Adonai, right here in the land."  A similar statement would be repeated for the next five plagues. The final plague, the tenth plague, God would spare the lives of the firstborn only within the homes where there was sacrificial blood on the lintel. Placing the blood on the lintel was a matter of obedience and faith; by the tenth plague the Israelites should have developed a saving faith and thus obeyed the command. The command was given to the Israelite people so that they would not experience this final plague; if they chose not to follow the commandment, their firstborn would die just as surely as the Egyptians who were not included in this 'salvific' act of faith.

I encourage us to read and re-read these accounts. The reason for doing so: if you have lived in Christ for any amount of time, you will have experienced suffering - not because God does not care for you or has abandoned you, nor necessarily because you/we have done something wrong (John 10:27-28). We may -- not everyone of God's people, but there may be some among those who will, for example, be impacted by extreme weather events and lose materials things as their neighbors around them have, or who may be the victim of an automobile accident like others have suffered who may not be children of God, or other set backs - even unexpected death (Romans 14:7-9; Philippians 2:25-30). Why would God allow these things to befall those whom He has called to be His children? No doubt, the Israelites may have asked the same question, or began to doubt on the deliverance that had been promised. 

We may never know the exact, primary reason. But we will experience, by God's grace, a newer intimacy with God, a new revelation of who He is even in the throes of something negative. God does not promise us that He will make us live forever in these damaged bodies and souls (Romans 7:23-24); He promised to never leave us. He uses the hard things and turns them into something good for a reason that has to do with our eternal souls and eternal relationship with Him (Romans 8:28). While the Israelites would have been pained for a short period of time, their experience nevertheless gave them a new understanding of who the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was. That He was not some mythical person, nor far away unsympathetic god type, or the god of cultural lore. He is real, He is Almighty, Creator, Sovereign, and Deliverer (Exodus 15:1-18). The Great I AM wants us to know Him as such also; in the new covenant that we are blessed to be under, our future is one that would have been hard for the Israelites of Moses' day to understand. Because our future is founded in the blood of Jesus and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit in our lives. Yet, in both cases, RELATIONSHIP is at the heart of the matter. 

Is our relationship with God beyond stories, Christmas and Easter, good times and material blessings? Do we seek to obey Him by knowing His word and keeping it? Do we long to live a life of sacrifice to Him, or do we long for the days before we knew God when we felt free to live our lives to please ourselves? Have we engaged in relationship with God to know all that He has revealed about Himself, or do we 'engage' with God long enough to get the rewards? These are tough questions; these are tough times. As God shows us in His Word: Today is the day of salvation; do not harden your hearts in rebellion and suffer a death that one can never rise from.


Wednesday, July 26, 2023

Special Mid-Summer Bible Conversation on Hard Sayings in the Bible (Question 3 - Born Again))

  

1.    John 3 Rebirth - "Being Born Again" & Salvation. This passage is so loaded doctrinally!   I think the three most offered answers when people are asked if they are born again are: “I don’t believe in that holy roller stuff!” (no doubt referring to the frantic behavior of some who are presumed touched by the Spirit during worship); the second is, “what do you mean?”; and, lastly, “I don’t know!” Some believe that being born again means that God refreshes us with His Spirit, which would infer that we are reborn several times.

God reveals to His people the character or operationality of salvation for believers. (we find a further level of understanding in John 4.) Salvation was not earned by being legally ‘right’ by an obedience to the Law. God says that the 10 commandments and the other Mosaic laws could not eternally save; in the Law God demonstrates how to worship Him, how to rely solely on Him for our needs; He refers to the Law as a "disciplinarian" that would reveal our need for a Savior, but which could not eternally save someone. Nicodemus and other religious leaders of his time relied upon both the Torah – God authored,  and the Talmud, or the “Oral Law” – human interpretation of the Torah. Holding fast to both the Law and interpretations developed by the priests and rabbis was the standard of righteousness that was thought to make them worthy of life in the world to come.

Before we go into the deep exposition of Jesus’s words in John 3, let’s look at Ephesians 2 to get a fundamental understanding of salvation.

 

Evangelicals and others generally believe that salvation is a synergistic process – that before you can be saved, you have to develop faith, so that salvation is dependent first upon actions we take. That is, according to some beliefs, it is our efforts through which we can negotiate a peace with God that makes us worthy of salvation. Or, more commonly, “you have to get right before you come to Church!” Reading the first 3 verses of Ephesians 2 we are told by the Holy Spirit a different beginning. [read a couple of times from different versions - easy to do at the Biblegateway.com link above] Can a dead person believe in God and develop faith? Because the Spirit is telling us here that we were dead – D E D D -- spiritually. We were consumed by lusts that lent to trespasses – the act of going outside of the law into forbidden area – and by a myriad of sins, which are inherent in us and easily influenced by the satanic world culture in what we think, do, and are.

 

Answer this: when Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, was Lazarus really dead? Or was he in-between life and death in some suspended state of consciousness? Put a pin in the Ephesians passage for a minute and Let’s see what the Spirit tells us at John 11 about Lazarus. We’ll read verses 11-17, and then pick up at 38-39. 


Not only was Lazarus dead, but his body was beginning to decay – there was already a stench emanating from Lazarus’ tomb! Lazarus was dead – D E D D. There was no life in him – not even one gasp of breath. So when Jesus got to the tomb, did He wait for Lazarus to come out simply because He was present there in front of the tomb? Did the mourners – both genuine and in tradition – through their tears and crying, through their pleadings, cause Lazarus to come back to life? Or was Lazarus starting to remove the many bandages that were on him so that he could be ready for Christ’s arrival? NO! NO! Read verses 41-44. No matter how much crying and mourning, no matter that the family believed that “someday” in “the resurrection” that their beloved brother would return to them – someday, somehow, somewhere. No. It was only by the power of God in Christ that Lazarus is raised from the dead. Jesus COMMANDS Lazarus to come out! He commands him. It was not until then that Lazarus could move, become sentient, become alive and obediently come forward from the tomb (since he was bound head to toe, some scholars suggest that he came forward without walking). He was made alive by Christ, regenerated/re-created. Regenerated is a word you’ll hear church folk say sometimes; it means, relative to being born again, to form or be formed again; come or bring into existence once again spiritually through the Holy Spirit.


Going back to Ephesians 2 again at verses 1-3: Spiritual death is as insusceptible by human efforts as was Lazarus’ physical death. What is worse is that the spiritual death which we ALL walked in – you know that expression, “dead man walking”, was and is the result of the inherited sin nature from Adam. Our already condemned state of spiritual death was exacerbated with our being infused with a world culture influenced and guided by the devil and his demons. We were objects of God’s wrath, because God loathes sin and does not “entertain”, i.e., He does not become Abba to spiritually dead people. We were born spiritually dead, dead relationship with God, and remain so until a similar command is given to us to become alive spiritually. let’s pick up at verse 4 through verse 10. [reader reads it] What does the Spirit say had to occur before we could be saved? [God had to make us alive; He calls us out of our spiritual death (KJV says quickened)], He without any help from us resurrects us or raises us up back to spiritual life, raises us up as it were to life in the Spirit, placing His Eternal Spirit within us to regenerate us and deposit a new faith instantaneously as He did with Lazarus. In the face of those Bible truths, the thought that we of our own volition according to evangelicals and others who make that claim, can prepare ourselves to be saved, can clean up our life to become fitting before a Holy God, can read scripture and understand it and then apply it in a way that pleases God is ludicrous! Can dead people think? Can dead people reason?


Do you think that being raised from the dead changed Lazarus’ outlook on life? When God raises us from spiritual death to spiritual life, He performs an unequivocable miracle within us where we not only come to life but are endowed with the faith needed to please God. God has chosenwe did not originate that choice - to create new life in us, restores us to spiritual aliveness. This is the "process" referred to in John 3 as being born again.

So with this detailed backdrop on God's salvific plan, we can now 'unpack'  Jesus' explanation to Nicodemus of being born again. We’ll take it step by step.


(a) Nicodemus bravely comes at night to where Jesus is staying. What he had to say he did not want to ask in an open forum or on the street as many of the Pharisees liked doing with the purpose of tripping Jesus up. Nicodemus wanted more than what his opening words said; Jesus, who was fully God and fully man knew in His Godship what was on Nicodemus’ heart, what brought him out of his home at night to seek Him out Jesus, and so Jesus wastes no time getting to the heart of the matter. Cool, right? Read verse 2. During the course of the conversation Jesus would ask Nicodemus how could he, i.e., Nicodemus, who was a teacher of Israel not understand the requirement of being born again and what that means. Even today, those who have a standing within the Church of God are still puzzled by what it means, although they have before them God’s Word of truth that provides the answer.
(b) Entering the kingdom of God – was Jesus saying that in order to go to heaven you have to be born again, thus equating the kingdom of God with heaven? It is true that many equate God’s kingdom with heaven since God and Christ sit on thrones in the Kingdom. In studying this passage, I am thinking that Jesus, in speaking of the kingdom of God, means not just the ‘heavenly’ Kingdom, but His universal kingdom – God’s rule, over those who are His Church – both here on earth and in heaven. It is not a singular geographical location, nor is it solely heaven. I mean, what did Jesus teach us to pray in the Lord’s prayer about God’s kingdom? [allow answer] That God’s kingdom would also be on earth. So the kingdom is borne from heaven, "from above", – i.e., God’s rule emanates from heaven. Thus, I think that Jesus was referring to entering into God’s theocratic spiritual domain where worshipers on earth and heaven obey God and do the work and will God has appointed them to do. The Holy Spirit binds together believers who are living on earth into this kingdom domain which is growing with believers daily. Jesus’ parables of the kingdom refers to this change of rule within our hearts while we are still alive on earth. Therefore, It is not a geographical location as Jesus confirms in the account at John 4 where Jesus’ encounters the Samaritan woman. Jesus further shows the invisible aspect of the kingdom of God when He says that "the kingdom is within you" – [ask for any questions or more clarification]
(c) Born again of water... Let’s talk about the “water” first. Jesus says we must be born of water and Spirit before we can enter into the kingdom. Nicodemus was clearly puzzled because he knew that in order to be born, conception must take place and one must live in the waters of a mother’s womb for nine months. So he tells Jesus, I’m a grown man; I cannot climb back into my mother’s womb! So we come to this point on which Christians will sometimes disagree – even Christians within the same denomination! I do not want this to be an argument, or a "2 by 4" insistence on a point of view, or judgement but rather an opportunity to share what we have learned, and allow the Holy Spirit to correct any misplaced thoughts.

This is where believers have different viewpoints of what the “water” represents, namely:

  • Some say that the “water” is baptismal water – that you have to have been baptized in water in order for the ‘salvation transition’ to take place; 
  • Others say that Jesus was telling Nicodemus that only those born from the womb – who lived within that protective sac for the duration would meet the requirement of “water”. 
  • Yet others say that the ”water” means that a person will be required to know God’s Word – which the scriptures metaphorically refer to as water, as part of the qualification for being born again.
My personal thought, based on the context of the conversation, is that the “water” refers to the waters of birth from a human mother.  Jesus says as He continues explaining this regeneration process to Nicodemus: “what is flesh is flesh (born of a woman) and what is Spirit is Spirit” (born of God). It would seem that in being born again, a person must first be human born of a woman. As such, there are no born again angels, no born again animals. In passages of the Gospels where we read about the person that hanged on the cross next to Jesus, and who confessed his belief in Jesus as Savior and Messiah, the criminal had first rejected Jesus and had joined in with the other criminal in the verbal abuse of Christ. (Mark 15:29, 32) Luke’s account in chapter 23, verses 39-43 reflects that when the Holy Spirit opened the thief’s mind and heart, the thief repented and rebuked the other criminal for his continued castigation and berating of Christ, and then asks Jesus to remember him when He enters the kingdom. Jesus, who in His Godship foreknew the “election” of the thief, did not act surprised by the thief’s question, did not have to convince the thief that his change of heart was by the Holy Spirit. God the Holy Spirit did His work with the thief, so that Jesus responds, “Truly I tell you today that you will be with me in Paradise”, i.e., he would be raised back to life and would live again in Jesus' presence. Jesus does not add, “but, first we have to get you down from this cross and baptized in the Jordan River or the temple pool for this salvation to stick, and then put you back up on the cross.” Some denominations equate the Christian water baptism to the water baptism that John the Baptizer performed for the forgiveness of sins – a baptism of repentance. It was synonymous to a cleansing ritual under the Mosaic Law that would make God's people ready to worship Him and to come into His presence before the Tabernacle. The Christian’s cleansing is by the blood of Christ and the Word according to Ephesians 5 and Hebrews 9; it is a continual cleansing – when you’re not in the Word you are not getting clean! As scripture shows us and even the catechism shows—to some extent, that water baptism does not guarantee salvation; rather, it is an outward sign or symbol of an inward grace or saving faith transferred to us, so as to make a worthy commitment to Christ. According to Ephesians 1:12-14, it is God the Holy Spirit in us that is the guarantee. In Romans 6:2-4, the apostle Paul refers to the grace of salvation that causes us to die to sin – being transferred from spiritual death and darkness, to spiritual life and light. Creating a complete change of heart within the individual, and becoming submitted to Christ using the metaphor of being baptized into Christ’s death, i.e., dying to Christ is dying to sin, as Christ died for all sin. Then there comes the raising to life, The Life of Christ sustained by the Holy Spirit.


(d) Born again through the Spirit. Undoubtedly, Nicodemus – as some professing Christians do even now – saw and see the Holy Spirit or Spirit of God solely as a power or force of God. They did not/do not understand the personhood of God the Holy Spirit. Also, during the “Old Testament Times” the Holy Spirit’s work in and with a human was often limited or bestowed for a particular time frame or purpose. Like the anointing of artisans in the building of the Tabernacle; in God’s prophets who spoke by the Spirit; the writers of OT scripture who were informed by the Spirit. Or the accomplishment of miracles and such. However, due to what Jesus, the long-awaited Messiah would accomplish on the cross, God the Holy Spirit would actually dwell within a person who has confessed Christ crucified for his/her sins, and who have made Jesus the Lord over their life; they recognize that they have been bought or redeemed with the precious blood of Jesus and no longer can claim ownership of themselves. 1 Corinthians 6 plainly shows that one’s salvation becomes operational within a person who has been washed in the blood, which justified them before a Holy God, and who are sanctified (set apart by God to accomplish His purpose through them) through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, which guarantees that position. [repeat slowly] God the Holy Spirit had Paul communicate this truth more than once to the churches of his day (see Ephesians, Romans, et al.), and has caused it to permanently reside in the collection of holy writings, i.e., the Bible – made holy because it’s Author, God the Holy Spirit, is Divine. Jesus, during His last night on earth, told soon-to-be traumatized disciples in John 14-17 that the Holy Spirit would come and be in them, indwell them to guarantee their salvation and empower them for God’s purposes for them. Romans chapter 8 tells us plainly that the Spirit gives life, and if He does not dwell in a person they are not of Christ – no matter how they identify themselves. Ephesians 1 tells us that God has placed the Holy Spirit in those who are saved as a guarantee of our salvation, signifying that the Holy Spirit is tasked with the growing of believers into the image of Christ. [touching back to the “election” - a hard saying whose explanation would consume the better part of half a day - God foreknew who He would choose to be graced with salvation; therefore, God the Holy Spirit cannot be influenced by any rite or ritual to indwell someone who is not called to salvation – no matter what happens within the worship tradition of a congregation. We humans are made individually aware of our salvation, but we cannot read anyone’s heart – let alone police our own without the Spirit’s intervention. In Acts 11:16 and 1 Corinthians 12, scripture refers to this indwelling as being baptized by the Spirit. It is that baptism which guarantees our salvation. (Ephesians 1:13,14)

(d) Sainthood. The Roman Catholic Church for hundreds of years has claimed the right and authority to reward certain persons with the designation of sainthood. Such individuals were believed to be men and women of “heroic virtue” who would after their deaths hold a privileged place with God in heaven. [see full article here] Because of this, saints were considered to be spiritual guides and mentors, who would add their prayers in heaven to those offered by Christians still living in the material world. Their ranks include martyrs, kings
 and queens, missionaries, widows, theologians, parents, nuns and priests, and “everyday people” who dedicated their lives to the loving pursuit of God. The designation process is called canonization, which has been described as a long and a politically fraught process. The first canonized person by the Roman Church occurred in 993 AD; certain named persons in scripture, including the apostles and those associated closely with Christ, were posthumously referred to as St. Peter, St. Mark, St. John, etc. Yet, is this the Bible’s definition of saints?  [see also full articles at the online Encylopedia Brittanica, on this day, BBC report]

I’m afraid not! In scripture passages (and this is just a partial list) we find the opposite: at Matthew 27:52, Acts 9:13,32, 41; Romans 1:7; Romans 8:27; Romans 12:13; Romans 15:25, 26.31; 1 Corinthians 1:2; 1 Corinthians 16:15; Ephesians 1:1; Philippians 1:1; 2 Thess. 1:10; and Revelation 5:9. As you read these passages, you will see that these were written to the common folk who worshiped God in the community of believers. These were persons indwelt by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit calls them “saints.” (pls. note that of the commonly used Bible versions, only the NIV omits the word “saints” and uses instead, “holy ones”). 

For those whose minds are still married to the Roman Catholic See’s self-authority to name saints, let us go deeper into the language in which these passages listed above were written – Koine Greek. The word for “holy” in the Greek language derives from the word hagios (HAH-gee-ohs). Interestingly, there are passages in the Old Testament, e.g., Psalm 31:23; Deuteronomy 33:2-3; 2 Chronicles 6:41, to name a few - speak also of “holy ones” or saints; in that instance the Hebrew word kedosh or phrase kol kedoshav is used. So what does holy one in scripture refer to? It is translated – appropriately – as “saints” (harking back to the Latin translation of hagios to "sanctus") which means individuals set aside by God through the Holy Spirit indwelling them to do God’s holy work and purpose. God does not make us saints because of our works, but because of His work in us. We could never on our own merit be made a saint through heroic works, despite the “sainthood” that the Catholic Holy See authorizes itself to perform.  We become saints positionally – that is, when we are saved and born again through the Spirit, God makes our position that of being holy, covered by Christ’s blood, no longer estranged from Him. We are transferred from the kingdom of darkness to the kingdom of light (Colossians 1:12-13). Again, God does not make us saints because of our works, but, rather, because of His work in us, through the Holy Spirit, Who makes us “children of God, born of God, heirs with Christ.” That is the Biblical definition of what a saint is. The Bible does not claim levels of sainthood as some have been led to believe; as seen above, sainthood is not a title earned by exceptional acts, therefore to be something that places persons at a better advantage than others. That is not Biblical. There are no lower saints, higher saints, etc. Sainthood is a position in which God places all who have been saved - being a saint simply means that God makes holy what was once unholy. (See 1 Peter 2) (Dr. Charles Stanley preached more than once on this topic because of the ingrained wrong understanding held by many as to what God calls a saint. The sermons can be found online at intouch.org.) It is surmised that the Roman Catholic Church was persuaded to promote the idea that persons "achieving" sainthood would be assigned to different levels of holiness by the governing body incorporating culturally accepted teachings in that regard. This would appease some, and by so doing, the Roman Church would place itself in a role of authority presumed endowed by God, but which is, in truth, one that God never gave it.

Per the above, not all translations make the distinction of translating the original languages for "holy ones" as "saints" in the English translation, but the Hebrew and Greek words cited above will be present each time. Translations that use the word “saints” appropriately in their English versions (this list is not all-inclusive but am citing some of the familiar translations/versions) are the English Standard Version, the Amplified Version, the 21st Century NKJV, the American SV, the Holman Christian, International Standard, King James V./NKJV, The Living Bible, NASB, and NRSV. The NIV does not include the word saints in either the Old or New Testament, no doubt because of the Latin rendering of "sanctus" for the ancient Hebrew and Greek words. It translates the original Hebrew and Greek as "holy ones" without the added Latin version.  

So is it wrong to call the apostles St. so and so? No. What is wrong is not calling all of the persons saints that God calls saints.

So, by God’s determination, He sets aside persons to carry out His will. He does not leave this up to a denomination or a political process; only He can read the heart and know its contents. Jesus plainly says, “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day.” 

So to sum up: how does God make His determination as to who He sets aside? The process is formally called election. In the Old Testament we see God's hand at work: it was those who were bought/redeemed by blood from enslavement in Egypt, and brought into covenant relationship with Jehovah God/Elohim/Adonai, who would be called to be holy as God is holy. Their keeping covenant with God would allow them to be in right standing with God, or as some are described in the Old Testament, being “righteous persons.”  (Deuteronomy 7:6-8; 2 Samuel 7:23-24; et al.) God created a people through whom He would reveal Himself, record the oracles and employ them in God’s Name, and it would be that God ordained/set aside nation through whom the Messiah – God’s remedy and salvific provision would come; He would become the bridge that heals the broken relationship between God and humanity. In the OT, those saints or persons set aside or apart by God to carry out His holy purpose would be enabled to do so by the Holy Spirit - e.g., see 1 Kings 8:53 - for a determined time frame. The psalmist David, in Psalm 51, asks God to not take His Holy Spirit away from him; the psalmist knew that God’s Spirit would rest on certain individuals for a limited time and for a unique purpose – that He would not be permanently indwelling persons at that time. Things would change upon Christ’s coming and His work at the cross. He fulfilled the requirement to be a perfect sacrifice for the death-dealing sin inherited from Adam. Because of that one act, we who are not under the Mosaic Covenant are graced to enter into a New Covenant with Christ that would restore our relationship with the Father. The Holy Spirit baptizes us, indwells us to guarantee that relationship; He does so following the individual’s repentance of sins and repentance of their rejection of Jesus, and removal of self from the throne that belongs to Christ and make Him our Lord.